International Journal of Changes in Education

• Sun, W. (2004). Yīng yǔ zhuān yè xué shì lùn wén xiě zuò xiàn zhuàng fēn xī [An analysis of the current situation of English major undergraduates’ BA thesis writing]. Foreign Language World, 3, 59–64.
• Yang, L. (2015). Jiào shī zhǐ dǎo yǔ xué shēng xué shù yīng yǔ xiě zuò néng lì fā zhǎn—“xué shù yīng yǔ yuè dú yǔ xiě zuò kè chéng” de fǎn sī xìng jiào xué yán jiū [Instructor’s guidance and students’ academic English writing competence development: Reflective classroom research on an academic English reading and writing course]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 5, 29–35.
• Hutson, J. (2025). Human-AI collaboration in writing: A multi-dimensional framework for creative and intellectual authorship. International Journal of Changes in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024908
• Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270
• Teng, F. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304
• Brown, N. B. (2024). Enhancing trust in LLMs: Algorithms for comparing and interpreting LLMs. arXiv Preprint: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.01943
• Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17
• Wen, Q. (2024). Will foreign language education in the AI era undergo a disruptive revolution? Modern Foreign Languages, 47(5), 722–731.
• Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., ... & Gašević, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370
• Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
• Esmaeil, A. A. A., Dzulkifli, D. N. A. K., Maakip, I., Matanluk, O. O., & Marshall, S. (2023). Understanding student perception regarding the use of ChatGPT in their argumentative writing: A qualitative inquiry. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-08
• Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
• Pudasaini, S., Miralles-Pechuán, L., Lillis, D., & Llorens Salvador, M. (2024). Survey on AI-generated plagiarism detection: The impact of large language models on academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1–34. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09576-x
• Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays—Should professors worry? Nature News Explainer. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
• Teng, M. F. (2023). Scientific writing, reviewing, and editing for open-access TESOL journals: The role of ChatGPT. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 5(1), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230107
• Wen, Q., & Liang, M. (2024). Rén jī hù dòng xié shāng néng lì: ChatGPT yǔ wài yǔ jiào yù [Human-AI interactive negotiation competence: ChatGPT and foreign language education]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 56(2), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.19923/j.cnki.fltr.2024.02.006
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Ngo, T. T. N., Chen, H. H. J., & Lai, K. K. W. (2024). The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL writing: A three-level meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096642
• Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607201
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Hyland, K. (2013). Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.06.003
• Guo, Q., Feng, R. L., & Hua, Y. F. (2023). ChatGPT zài yīng yǔ xué shù lùn wén xiě zuò yǔ jiào xué zhōng de yìng yòng jí qián zài wèn tí [Using ChatGPT in English academic writing: Benefits and issues]. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 2, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.20139/j.issn.1001-5795.2023.02.003
• Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
• Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges. Assessing Writing, 19, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009
• Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2021). Collaborative peer feedback and learning analytics: Theory-oriented design for supporting class-wide interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1764490
• Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 38(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206076157
• Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8435–8463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0
• Stevenson, M. (2016). A critical interpretative synthesis: The integration of automated writing evaluation into classroom writing instruction. Computers and Composition, 42, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.05.001
• Chen, C. F. E., & Cheng, W. Y. E. C. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 94−112. https://doi.org/10125/44145
• Varnosfadrani, A. D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System, 37(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.04.004
• Qian, L., Zhao, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2020). Evaluating China’s automated essay scoring system iWrite. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119881472
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
• Biggs, J. B., & Tang, Catherine. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. UK: Open University Press.
• Lu, L. (2016). Jī yú zì dòng píng jià xì tǒng de dì èr xiě zuò guò chéng yán jiū [A study of the second writing process based on an automated essay evaluation tool]. Foreign Language World, 2, 88–96.
• Zhang, S., & Xu, J. (2019). ZPD shì jiǎo xià zài xiàn zì dòng fǎn kuì duì yīng yǔ bù tóng shuǐ píng xué xí zhě xiě zuò de yǐng xiǎng [The effect of online automated feedback on English writing across proficiency levels: From the perspective of the ZPD]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 5, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004617
• Zhang, Z. (2020). Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions. Assessing Writing, 43, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439
• Zhang, R. (2023). The impact of generative artificial intelligence technology on education—An interview on ChatGPT. E-Education Research, 2, 5–14.
• Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
• Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2023). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2, 81–83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465
• Chen, M., & Lü, M. (2024). ChatGPT huán jìng xià de dà xué yīng yǔ xiě zuò jiào xué [College English writing instruction in a ChatGPT context]. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 24(1), 161–168.
• Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
• Wilson, O., & Billam, J. (2023). ChatGPT in June 2023: An annotated bibliography for all professionals. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), 9–15.
• Javier, D. R. C., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Developing secondary school English language learners’ productive and critical use of ChatGPT. TESOL Journal, 15(2), e755. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.755
• Xu, L., Hu, J., & Su, Y. (2024). Rén gōng zhì néng fǔ zhù xué shù yīng yǔ xiě zuò de xué xí zhě rèn zhī jí xíng wéi yán jiū [EFL students’ perceptions and practices of AI-assisted English academic writing]. Foreign Language World, 3, 51–58.
• Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. UK: Pergamon Press.
• Casanave, C. P., & Vandrick, S. (2003). Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education. UK: Routledge.
• Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. UK: Routledge.
• Crosthwaite, P. (2017). Retesting the limits of data-driven learning: Feedback and error correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 447–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1312462
• Quinn, C. (2015). Training L2 writers to reference corpora as a self-correction tool. ELT Journal, 69(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu062
• Tono, Y., Satake, Y., & Miura, A. (2014). The effects of using corpora on revision tasks in L2 writing with coded error feedback. ReCALL, 26(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401400007X
• Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL students toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002
• Boulton, A. (2009). Data-driven learning: Reasonable fears and rational reassurance. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 81–106.
• Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2020). Appropriating automated feedback in L2 writing: Experiences of Chinese EFL student writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1329–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799824
• Xu, F. (2021). Wǒ guó èr yǔ xiě zuò yán jiū de ruò gān zhòng diǎn wèn tí [Some major issues in second language writing in China]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 53(4), 571–581.
• Guo, K., Chen, X., & Qiao, S. (2022). Exploring a collaborative approach to peer feedback in EFL Writing: How do students participate? RELC Journal, 55(3), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221143192
• Creswell, W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. UK: Pearson Education.
• Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. UK: Routledge.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
• Bai, L., & Hu, G. (2017). In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? Educational Psychology, 37(1), 67–81. http://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275
• Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
• Ilin, V., Ke, J., & Nuanla-Or, S. (2024). Influence of culture on Chinese university students’ interaction with feedback. International Journal of Changes in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022828
• Yang, M., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
• Ren, W., Liu, Y., & Xie, Y. (2024). Yīng yǔ xiě zuò jiào xué zhōng ChatGPT yǔ jiào shī fǎn kuì de duì bǐ yán jiū [A comparative study of ChatGPT and teacher feedback in English writing instruction]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 4, 30–38.
• Hartono, W., Nurfitri, N., Ridwan, R., Kase, E., Lake, F., & Zebua, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions in English language teaching: Teachers-students perceptions and experiences. Journal on Education, 6(1), 1452–1461.
• Li, J., & Chen, Q. (2025). Rén jī tóng xíng zhì néng xiě zuò fā zhǎn yǎn jìn fēn xī yǔ qǐ shì [Human-machine collaborative intelligent writings: Its evolution and implications]. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 25(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2025.01.008
• Akinwalere, S., & Ivanov, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Border Crossing, 12(1), 1–15.
• Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
• Mizumoto, A., Shintani, N., Sasaki, M., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Testing the viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100116

APA

Chen, Q. (2026). Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580

Vancouver

Chen Q. Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(3):305-15. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580

AMA

Chen Q. Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Changes in Education. 2026;3(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580

Chicago

Chen, Qianshan. "Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education". International Journal of Changes in Education 2026 3 no. 3 (2026): 305-315. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580

Harvard

Chen, Q. (2026). Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. International Journal of Changes in Education, 3(3), pp. 305-315. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580

MLA

Chen, Qianshan "Students’ Perceptions of AI-Powered Feedback in English Writing: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education". International Journal of Changes in Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2026, pp. 305-315. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52025580